Progressive-Economy@TASC
Printable page
TASC publishes discussion papers on strengthening public access to information

Commenting on the publications, TASC Head of Policy Sinéad Pentony said:

“Secret government, hidden information and blanket confidentiality are all inextricably linked to costly decisions which could be avoided if more people knew about them sooner. We need to open up policy-making to public scrutiny – by starting at the top and insisting that real explanations for policy decisions are given to the public by ministers as a matter of course. People are tired of spin and sound-bites.

 

“TASC’s work on open government follows on from our work on public bodies and accountability, published as Outsourcing Government in 2006, and the report of the Democratic Audit Ireland project, Power to the People, published in 2007. Strengthening Ireland’s democracy is vital to securing sustainable economic development, and public access to complete information is a basic right to ensure that explanations and evidence are given for the public policy decisions which affect us all”, Ms. Pentony said.

 

In The Role of Access to Information in Ireland’s Democracy, Dr O’Connor argues that Ireland lags behind comparable democracies in terms of open government and policy-making. The Oireachtas is one of the weakest parliaments in Europe, due to its lack of power to compel ministers to answer questions or deliver documents to committees in a timely manner. Dr O’Connor also contends that a culture of secrecy – exemplified by the fact that no government has abolished the Official Secrets Act 1963 – prevents the public to gain meaningful explanations of government policy decisions. The Freedom of Information Act 1997, designed to open up decision-making to public view, was eviscerated in 2003. The paper argues that a major shift in thinking is required if Ireland is to catch up with other advanced democracies and move to an era of open policy-making.

 

In An Economic Argument for Stronger Freedom of Information Laws in Ireland, Dr O’Connor presents the evidence that the current fees regime does not lead to any cost recovery and in fact is likely to increase administrative costs and deter ordinary people from making requests. He also demonstrates that the costs of administering FOI are far outweighed by the material benefits in terms of money saved as a result of the prevention or early detection of errors made by public bodies. Finally, Dr O’Connor points out that stronger FOI is essential to facilitate businesses re-using public data as a resource – a resource which, based on EU figures, could be worth a minimum of €83 million annually.

 

Speaking this afternoon, Dr O’Connor said:


“The economic crisis has brought home two important facts. Firstly, many decisions were taken during the boom and since that have never been explained or justified to the public, who are paying the price for those decisions. Secondly, we are facing a political crisis as well as our economic crisis. There is a lot of talk of political reform, but successive governments have failed to act on countless reports. It is time to give real power back to the public through laws that provide easy access to the background documents which explain current public policy.”
 



COMMENTS...

Donal O'Brolchain said...
I welcome the publication of these reports, which I have yet to read.

Others may be interested in my published views on Freedom of Information (FoI) as published here
http://politicalreform.ie/2010/06/21/freedom-of-information-and-corruption/

and in letters to the Editor when the FF-PD Coalition was changing the 1997 FoI Act in 2003
letters published in the
Sunday Business Post 16March2003
Sunday Independent 23March2003.


August 05, 2010 14:39


Donal O'Brolchain said...
Now that I have read the papers, I offer one factual correction to the Role of Access to information in Ireland's democracy". IMO, This minor correction does not lessen the thrust of Dr. O'Connor's arguments.

In par 20 (p.9-10), Dr. O'Connor states that "The Access to Information on the Environment Regulations in Ireland derive from a 2003 European Driective and grant access ....." etc.

For the record, it should be known that in 1993, a Statutory Instrument (http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1993/en/si/0133.html) brought a 1990 EU Directive (No. 90/313/EEC O.J. No. L158/56 of 23 June, 1990 on the Freedom of Access to Information on the Environment) into force.

During the 1990s, I used these regulations to access certain documents on transport policy in Dublin - much to the surprise of senior public servants! In recent years, I have used the more recent SIs to try to access data from bodies that are excluded from the Freedom of Information Acts. Due to other pressures, I was not able to pursue the request, which was not responded to within the timescales laid down.

Since then, I have found that the Government appears to have simply stopped collecting some other data which I would regard as normal for transport policy. I refer explicity to the Annual Average Daily Traffic(AADT) counts on national roads. If they continue to collect it, it is certainly virtually impossible to identify who holds it.
This data used to be avaialbe as a matter of routine from the now abolished An Foras Forbartha and it successors.
The last time I looked for this data, I was give the run around by both the the National Roads Authority(NRA) and the Road Safety Authority.

Without such data, how can we be sure that Government is not acting in whimsical and arbitrary ways in allocating capital for transport infrastructure projects?

August 10, 2010 19:07


noconnor said...
You are quite correct that the original Access to Information on the Environment regulations date from 1993. All EU countries have to have FOI on the environment, which was important in the early 1990s in giving all member states a taste of FOI (as many of them did not have broader FOI laws in place then, though most do now). The earlier regulations were replaced by Ireland's 2006 regulations, which are currently in force, which were a response to the 2003 Directive I refer to in the above paragraph.

More importantly, these regulations are a valuable and under-used resource. The Information Commissioner, Emily O'Reilly (who is also the Commissioner for Environmental Information, www.ocei.gov.ie) has talked about the lack of public awareness and use of these rules, which automatically cover all public bodies, unlike FOI which only covers a list of bodies.

I also agree with you that there is a major problem if public bodies stop collecting information that is important to understand and monitor the success/failure of public policy. Lots of scope for reform here!

August 12, 2010 10:44


POST A COMMENT:
Please log in to post a comment.
Username:
Password:
Forgot username/password? Click here
New user? Click here to register